CDC Makes Progress (Sort of) on Katrina Children’s Health Study

Will a ProPublica investigation force FEMA and the CDC to finally follow up on the health effects of formaldehyde in evacuee trailers?

Photo courtesy of Bill Starling/ProPublica

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


This story was first published on ProPublica.org.

Remember that study the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention promised it would do to track the health of children who lived in formaldehyde-contaminated trailers provided to Hurricane Katrina victims?

Well, the Federal Emergency Management Agency finally hit the send button on a database that the CDC needs to start the study. But the database doesn’t necessarily include the current addresses of the victims, making it difficult for the CDC to track down potential participants.

“We don’t generally capture a specific address for where the
occupants went after they leave our program,” said Johnathan Torres, a
program specialist for FEMA’s Housing Operations Unit. “But we always
know their pre-disaster residence.”

Unfortunately for the CDC,
the people who lived in the trailers are a highly mobile part of the
population. Many didn’t move back to their former addresses, because
their homes were destroyed by the hurricane.

The last time we reported
on this, Dr. Heidi Sinclair, a pediatrician based in Baton Rouge, La.,
commented on the difficulty of CDC’s task. “These people are going to
be impossible to track down. Most of them have pay-as-you-go cell
phones and have already moved,” Sinclair said. “CDC should have started
doing this a year before they wanted to start the study.”

Exposure
to formaldehyde can increase the risk of cancer and asthma attacks and
can cause severe skin, ear, nose and throat irritations, especially
among children and the elderly. The chemical is found in the glue that
is used to make plywood and particleboard in most trailers.

In February 2008, the CDC released test results
showing that people living in the trailers were exposed to levels of
formaldehyde far higher than what the government considers safe. This
countered the conclusions of a CDC study done a year earlier, which was
misused (PDF) by FEMA to tell Congress and the public that the formaldehyde did not reach “a level of concern.”

The
CDC started talking about doing a long-term examination of how children
were affected by the formaldehyde more than a year ago, but it still
hasn’t finalized a methodology for the study, according to Michael
McGeehin, the CDC official leading it.

In an e-mail to
ProPublica this week, McGeehin added that the agency won’t reveal the
details of the methodology until “a candidate is chosen to serve as a
contractor on this project” and the contractor gets a chance to help
shape the methodology.

A CDC PowerPoint presentation
(PDF) obtained by ProPublica shows that the CDC had originally planned
to get the study’s methodology approved by the White House’s Office of
Management and Budget in May 2008. But the CDC didn’t request the data it just received from FEMA until June 2008. FEMA previously cited privacy concerns to explain why it didn’t provide the information sooner.

We
have submitted a FOIA request for the database to see if we can get a
sense of how many current addresses are in it. To avoid any privacy
issues, we asked the CDC to redact names of individuals in the data.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate