Livni or Netanyahu? Israeli Prime Minister TBD by Radical Lieberman (Not That One)

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


After Israel’s  tight election for prime minister Kadima Party moderate Tzipi Livni is now just ahead of right-wing Likud Party leader Benjamin Netanyahu (with 28 vs. 27 seats in the Knesset). But the real power sits with rising radical Avigdor Liebermanan ultra-conservative who wants to establish a blanket denial of all Arabs for citizenshipwho can throw his support to either to determine who becomes prime minister. (He said he’s open to talking with both but will no doubt side with fellow hard-liner Netanyahu.)

This is not good news.It’s not good for anyone. Jews and non-Jews, Israelis and non-, and bad not only for those who want to see a just, fair, and reasoned outcome, because what is just is relative, but for anyone who don’t want to live, and have their kids live, in a war-ravaged country where their disenfranchised enemies have nowhere else to go, nothing else to turn to, than radical suicide-bombing, missile-firing jihad.

A Livni government would have meant a new approach to Israel’s Palestine Problem. Namely, she promised to get rid of the illegal settlements metastasizing throughout the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem. (The settlement population grew at 120% the rate of the Israeli population in 2007, and construction accelerated last year.) Under Netanyahu, settlements will continue to grow; Lieberman lives on a settlement. Which means impossible navigation for Palestinians, and shrinking options for a people now in the midst of their own (you’re free to object in the comments), holocaust.

Livni also strongly favors a two-state solution, a sentiment shared shared by Barack Obama, and one he’s going to have a bear of a time working out with Netanyahu in office and radicals ruling the day.

Godspeed, Mr. President.

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate