Mystery Solved: Where’d Shepard Fairey Get His Obama Headshot?

Obama/Hope image from <a href="http://pictureyear.blogspot.com/2009/01/mystery-deepens.html" target="new">The Year in Pictures</a>

Fight disinformation. Get a daily recap of the facts that matter. Sign up for the free Mother Jones newsletter.


It may be the most memorable piece of campaign-trail propaganda in recent memory, but Shepard Fairey’s Obama “Hope” poster also has been something of a graphic-design mystery since it was unveiled a year ago. Amazingly, until now, no one’s known where the original image of Barack Obama that Fairey used came from. Fairey’s been slammed for lifting images from other artists and photographers without adequate attribution or compensation, so it’s not surprising that he didn’t keep track of his source image. (For more on Fairey’s response to criticism that he’s a rip-off artist with mad Adobe Illustrator skills, see Mother Jones’ recent interview with him.) Last week, a gallery owner claimed victory, saying he’d tracked down the original to a Reuters photographer. But now Philadelphia Inquirer photographer Tom Gralish has definitively solved the mystery of the missing headshot. He’s located the true original, a photo shot by an AP freelancer at an April 2006 National Press Club meeting where then-senator Obama and George Clooney talked about Darfur.

As Gralish notes:

So, it looks like the image that poster artist Shepard
Fairey said looked presidential, telling the Washington Post: “He is
gazing off into the future, saying, ‘I can guide you,'” actually showed
our new president listening to George Clooney.

Clooney was sitting on Obama’s right, so (as Gralish adds) the
senator was more likely looking at another speaker, like Senator Sam
Brownback. We’ll never know what was going through Obama’s head as the
immortal photo was taken, but I am relieved to know that he was
probably thinking about bigger things than the plot inconsistencies in Ocean’s 12.

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Or at least we hope. It’s fall fundraising time, and we’re trying to raise $250,000 to help fund Mother Jones’ journalism during a shorter than normal three-week push.

If you’re reading this, a fundraising pitch at the bottom of an article, you must find our team’s reporting valuable and we hope you’ll consider supporting it with a donation of any amount right now if you can.

It’s really that simple. But if you’d like to read a bit more, our membership lead, Brian Hiatt, has a post for you highlighting some of our newsroom's impressive, impactful work of late—including two big investigations in just one day and covering voting rights the way it needs to be done—that we hope you'll agree is worth supporting.

payment methods

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Or at least we hope. It’s fall fundraising time, and we’re trying to raise $250,000 to help fund Mother Jones’ journalism during a shorter than normal three-week push.

If you’re reading this, a fundraising pitch at the bottom of an article, you must find our team’s reporting valuable and we hope you’ll consider supporting it with a donation of any amount right now if you can.

It’s really that simple. But if you’d like to read a bit more, our membership lead, Brian Hiatt, has a post for you highlighting some of our newsroom's impressive, impactful work of late—including two big investigations in just one day and covering voting rights the way it needs to be done—that we hope you’ll agree is worth supporting.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate