Mystery Solved: Where’d Shepard Fairey Get His Obama Headshot?

Obama/Hope image from <a href="http://pictureyear.blogspot.com/2009/01/mystery-deepens.html" target="new">The Year in Pictures</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


It may be the most memorable piece of campaign-trail propaganda in recent memory, but Shepard Fairey’s Obama “Hope” poster also has been something of a graphic-design mystery since it was unveiled a year ago. Amazingly, until now, no one’s known where the original image of Barack Obama that Fairey used came from. Fairey’s been slammed for lifting images from other artists and photographers without adequate attribution or compensation, so it’s not surprising that he didn’t keep track of his source image. (For more on Fairey’s response to criticism that he’s a rip-off artist with mad Adobe Illustrator skills, see Mother Jones’ recent interview with him.) Last week, a gallery owner claimed victory, saying he’d tracked down the original to a Reuters photographer. But now Philadelphia Inquirer photographer Tom Gralish has definitively solved the mystery of the missing headshot. He’s located the true original, a photo shot by an AP freelancer at an April 2006 National Press Club meeting where then-senator Obama and George Clooney talked about Darfur.

As Gralish notes:

So, it looks like the image that poster artist Shepard
Fairey said looked presidential, telling the Washington Post: “He is
gazing off into the future, saying, ‘I can guide you,'” actually showed
our new president listening to George Clooney.

Clooney was sitting on Obama’s right, so (as Gralish adds) the
senator was more likely looking at another speaker, like Senator Sam
Brownback. We’ll never know what was going through Obama’s head as the
immortal photo was taken, but I am relieved to know that he was
probably thinking about bigger things than the plot inconsistencies in Ocean’s 12.

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate