Clinton Foundation Donor Info: Playing Hard To Get?

Facts matter: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter. Support our nonprofit reporting. Subscribe to our print magazine.


When Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton decided to work together–with her becoming secretary of state–part of the deal was that the William J. Clinton Foundation, which funds the former president’s globetrotting do-gooding and his presidential library, would release all of its donors going back to 1997. For years, Bill Clinton had declined to reveal who was backing his foundation. But the point, as a foundation press release noted, was “to ensure that not even the appearance of a conflict of interest existed between the Clinton Foundation’s operations and Senator Clinton’s anticpated service as Secretary of State.”

On Thursday, the foundation posted the names of those donors on its website–all 2922 pages of them. The list includes a host of foreign governments (Norway, Kuwait, Qatar, Taiwan), Stephen Speilberg’s foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Blackwater, General Motors, Freddie Mac, and Citigroup’s foundation.

Beyond the specific contributions, what’s notable is that this list is damn hard to navigate. To review the contributors, a visitor–say, a journalist–has to click through nearly 3000 pages. As of today, it was not searchable. And the names are provided without addresses or any identifying information. (Political campaigns have to provide the Federal Elections Commission addresses and employment information for their donors.) So who’s this Nasser Al-Rashid, who gave between $1 million and $5 million. Cut to Google: he’s a Saudi Arabian businessman, supposedly an influential adviser to the Saudi royal family, and owner of one of the largest yachts in the world. Saudis have been especially generous to the Clinton Foundation.

The foundation also was apparently not prepared for the amount of traffic this disclosure would draw. No doubt, plenty of reporters–as well as opposition researchers, development officials at other foundations, and perhaps even overseas intelligence services–were interested in examining the list to see what they could find. In the hours after the list was posted, the site kept crashing.

But a search of the first few pages yielded some interesting high-rollers. Denise Rich, the ex-wife of fugitive businessman Marc Rich, donated between $250,000 and $500,000. Her former husband, who was indicted in the 1980s on charges of tax evasion and illegal dealmaking with Iran, was infamously pardoned by Clinton in the final hours of his presidency. The pardon was slammed by critics who alleged it had been bought by Denise Rich’s generous donations to the Democratic Party and Clinton’s presidential library.

Ahead of Rich on the list is Lakshmi Mittal, an Indian-born industrialist who’s worth an estimate $45 billion. He gave the foundation between $1 million and $5 million. Mittal has been accused of maintaining “slave labour” conditions in his mines, where nearly a hundred of his workers have died since 2004. In 2001, he was swept up in a British scandal
over whether the £125,000 he contributed to Tony Blair’s Labour Party influenced the British PM to further Mittal’s business interests.

Getting a bead on the less famous of Clinton’s 20,000 contributors will take a while. And the foundation has not made it easy. Putting the information out in a hard-to-search format without anything but the names and not having enough bandwith to meet the demand for access–could all this be by design? Whether or not it is, journalists (and others) ought to be able to work through the list before Hillary Clinton’s confirmation hearings.

REAL QUICK, REAL URGENT

Minority rule, corruption, disinformation, attacks on those who dare tell the truth: There is a direct line from what's happening in Russia and Ukraine to what's happening here at home. And that's what MoJo's Monika Bauerlein writes about in "Their Fight Is Our Fight" to unpack the information war we find ourselves in and share a few examples to show why the power of independent, reader-supported journalism is such a threat to authoritarians.

Corrupt leaders the world over can (and will) try to shut down the truth, but when the truth has millions of people on its side, you can't keep it down for good. And there's no more powerful or urgent argument for your support of Mother Jones' journalism right now than that. We need to raise about $450,000 to hit our online fundraising budget in these next few months, so please read more from Monika and pitch in if you can.

payment methods

REAL QUICK, REAL URGENT

Minority rule, corruption, disinformation, attacks on those who dare tell the truth: There is a direct line from what's happening in Russia and Ukraine to what's happening here at home. And that's what MoJo's Monika Bauerlein writes about in "Their Fight Is Our Fight" to unpack the information war we find ourselves in and share a few examples to show why the power of independent, reader-supported journalism is such a threat to authoritarians.

Corrupt leaders the world over can (and will) try to shut down the truth, but when the truth has millions of people on its side, you can't keep it down for good. And there's no more powerful or urgent argument for your support of Mother Jones' journalism right now than that. We need to raise about $450,000 to hit our online fundraising budget in these next few months, so please read more from Monika and pitch in if you can.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate