Stewart and Colbert Return Without the Prompter

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


mojo-photo-stewcolb2.jpg

As the writers’ strike continues, Comedy Central stalwarts Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert’s returns to the screen without their scribes last night were highly anticipated. Would they be able to talk, or would they just stare wide-eyed at the screen and stammer helplessly for 30 minutes? Well, both shows were entertaining (if slightly off) and definitely strike-focused, which in the current moment of political frenzy seemed kind of weird.

Stewart kicked off his show sporting a “strike unibrow” and proceeded to give a bitterly sarcastic rundown of the digital revenue the strikers are fighting for, saying the $1.99 fee for The Daily Show on iTunes isn’t for content, it’s for “shipping and handling.” There were some cute bits, like the on-screen caption “space reserved for clever pun,” but one wonders how much was, you know, written. Stewart was clearly furious over the situation and seemed to mock the very idea that he could be prevented from combining words with other words: a deliberate taunting of the Guild?

Colbert’s ironic shtick (“unions are destroying America!”) is probably easier to pull off under the circumstances, and as such was, in fact, a less-ambiguous stand than Stewart’s, but the show’s usual spiraling, complex word-play was absent last night. Colbert even had the cameras point at each other to prove there was nothing on the TelePrompters: wow, for real? But the Report relied heavily on clips from older shows, and both he and Stewart used the same joke about their writers playing “Guitar Hero.” That’s actually something I’ve often wondered about: how do they coordinate their scripts so they don’t end up doing the same bits? Guess that’s the writers’ job. Anyway, the New York Times was kind of harsh, calling Stewart’s show a “jarring display of solipsism” and lamenting the lack of attention to the issues of the day, saying many young people “rely on his show… as their chief source of news.” That’s a theory I hear all the time but I have yet to see proven by anything except a random poll showing college kids are likely to check off Stewart’s name on a survey. Clearly people are getting news other places too; otherwise how else would they get the jokes? If the lack of campaign mockery on the Daily Show adversely affect youth participation in the New Hampshire primary, as the Times seemed to suggest, then we’ve got bigger problems than just a strike.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate