Dick’s Defeat

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.




Might Dick Cheney’s days of stonewalling be coming to an end? Might the Wyoming oilman-turned-Halliburton boss-turned-Vice President finally be foreced to admit how deeply he let his buddies in the energy industry influence the findings of his 2000 federal energy policy task force?

Maybe. Maybe not. And maybe it doesn’t really matter.

Last week, those who hope that Cheeny’s day of reckoning is approaching were given reason to celebrate as a federal appeals court rejected the Bush administration’s latest attempt to evade a federal judge’s order calling for the disclosure of records related to the task force. That order, handed down by U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, would clear the way for two groups — Judicial Watch and The Sierra Club — to get information on who Cheney met with while developing his energy plan.

The administration now has two choices — honor the 2002 ruling and turn over the documents or take the matter to the Supreme Court. Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton told The Washignton Post that he hopes Cheney will finally come clean.

    “‘The vice president has been told by multiple courts that he is not above the law,’ Fitton said. ‘Perhaps now he will give up his legal stonewalling and begin complying with court orders to turn over his secret energy task force documents.'”

Of course, while the fight over how Cheney developed his plan is being slowly resolved in the courts, many of the policies he proposed are close to becoming law. With both the House and Senate having passed some version of an energy bill, Republican leaders have declared that they intend to push a GOP energy plan through to the president’s desk with or without the cooperation of their Democratic counterparts. As Bill Wicker, a spokesman for Democrats on the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, told The New York Times, “It is an optical illusion that Democrats are involved.”

    “‘To this point, they have not sought involvement of Democrats at all,’ said Representative Henry A. Waxman, Democrat of California and a member of the conference committee that is supposed to reconcile the House and Senate energy bills. ‘The Republicans are talking among themselves.'”

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate