Megawatt Christmas

California may be in the midst of an energy crisis, but that’s not stopping record numbers of Christmas obsessives from firing up high-voltage holiday displays.

Image: AP/Wideworld

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


On the lawn of an otherwise ordinary Southern California home, a wooden Santa Claus draped in twinkling lights sits at the wheel of ’57 Chevy. He is flanked by a radiant manger scene, a choo-choo train outlined with dazzling strands of holiday lights, and a 10-foot sign blazing “Happy Holidays” to all who drive by.

Meanwhile, in a much less festive building across the state in Sacramento, a room full of high-powered Grinches is busy preparing a special Christmas present for all the residents of California: a hefty hike in electrical power rates. This gift — courtesy of the legislators that deregulated the state’s electricity market in 1996, thereby helping to create the current energy crunch — raises a question for consumers whose houses are buzzing with plugged-in Christmas cheer: Might this be the year to leave the electric Santa in the closet and opt for a more energy-efficient display of holiday spirit?

Ho ho no, responds lighting technician Bob Matthews. His Irvine-based Christmas Lighting Company has been just as busy illuminating homes this year as it ever was in trouble-free times. In fact, says Matthews, demand for holiday lighting services is growing so quickly that even a recent influx of no fewer than five local competitors has not decreased his work load in the slightest. “I keep my own lights off every once in a while because I feel directly responsible,” he jokes.

The electric decoration business is shining brighter than ever nationwide, according to Jim Ketchum, CEO of Texas-based Christmas Décor, a company that franchises systems that teach people to run their own lights services. When it started in 1996, Christmas Décor lit up a total of 350 homes and businesses. This year, its 300 US and Canadian franchisees decorated a total of 350,000 homes and businesses, making it the ninth-fastest growing franchise in the US, according to Entrepreneur Magazine. “There’s a lot of market that we haven’t gotten to yet,” says Ketchum.

Some of the more elaborate displays cost thousands of dollars and require 10,000-plus individual bulbs, many of which suck up five watts of power each. Multiply that force by millions of light-adorned homes, and the result is a power drain felt by electricity suppliers from Thanksgiving to the end of the year.

Each year, says spokesperson Lori O’Donley of the California Independent System Operator, the nonprofit group that controls the state’s electrical grid and delivers power to 27 million customers, holiday lights add a 1,000-megawatt burden to the state’s power suppliers. That’s equivalent to the amount of energy needed to service one million homes.

O’Donley’s group issued a statement earlier this month asking customers to wait until 7 p.m. to turn on their holiday lights. Since the level of power usage peaks at 6 p.m., customers who wait an extra hour to start their nightly light display help power suppliers avoid blackouts. “There are a lot of people out there who are thinking about what they turn on and when,” insists O’Donley.

Maybe, but Gene Gregory isn’t one of them. “My neighbors would shoot me if I turned it off,” says Gregory, owner of the extravagant Chevy-Claus lawn display that has illuminated his home in a Bear Creek, Calif. gated community for the last three years. Sure, he knows about the current power situation. But Gregory feels that his contribution to holiday cheer outweighs the state’s electricity woes. “It’s for my kids,” he says. “When I’m dead and gone I hope they’ll remember Christmases at home.”

Gregory estimates that he’s spent $10,000 on holiday lighting and props over the years, not including the power bills that usually double over the holidays. “I’m running out of yard and I’m already out of money,” he says, “but I’ve got another year to make some more.”

California’s energy suppliers might not be so lucky. This week Southern California Edison, one of the state’s biggest utilities companies, announced that it might have to declare bankruptcy if the government doesn’t step in soon with financial relief.

Whether that’s a legitimate claim or a ploy to scare Gov. Gray Davis into approving utilities rate hikes is up for debate. (“Yeah, right. We’re having a bake sale for [the utilities], they’re so poor,” snorts Mindy Spatt, media director of the San Francisco-based Utility Reform Network.) Either way, consumers are in for a holiday season of unreliable power. And, chances are, that electric Santa ensemble will soon cost a whole lot more.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate