The Man Who Would Be Veep

Say what you will about George W.’s pick for vice president. Come to think of it, why not listen to what he has to say for himself?

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


You may know him as a Texas oil tycoon. Or perhaps you remember his days as George Bush Sr.’s Secretary of Defense; or as vice chairman of the Iran-Contra hearings; or even as Gerald Ford’s chief of staff. More likely than not, you don’t remember him at all. Yet, as of today, Richard “Dick” Cheney stands a better than 50-50 chance of replacing Al Gore as Vice President of the United States. Throughout his quarter-century of public service, Cheney has earned a reputation as a thinking-man’s conservative — not to mention as a short-tempered hawk. We offer this primer on the man who reminds us of the last Vice President Dick (Nixon, that is). Herewith, Cheney in his own words:

On ambition:
“I set out to be a political science teacher. My years in Washington sort of got in the way of that, but it all ties in. What I want to do is political stuff.” — The Washington Post, Aug. 28, 1978

On compromise:
“Confrontation fits our strategy. Polarization often has very beneficial results. If everything is handled through compromise and conciliation, if there are no real issues dividing us from the Democrats, why should the country change and [vote us into office]?” —The New Republic, June 3, 1985

On patriotism:
“I had other priorities in the ’60s than military service.” — The Washington Post, April 5, 1989

On defense:
“Denuclearization is not a good idea.” — UPI, May 8, 1990

On the bloated defense budget:
“Threats have become remote. So remote that they are difficult to discern.” — Mother Jones, Sept./Oct. 1993

On the importance of education (specifically, his at Yale):
“I flunked out.” — The Washington Post, April 3, 1991

On style:
“I don’t tend to pound on the podium and drool.” –AP, October 10, 1994,

On his similarity to Popeye:
“I am what I am, and if people aren’t willing to accept me on that basis then, hell, vote for somebody else.” — U.S. News & World Report, Oct. 25, 1993

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate