Tobacco and Rupe

Secret documents show that Philip Morris loves Rupert Murdoch’s tobacco-friendly media. That might explain why he’s on their board.

Fight disinformation. Get a daily recap of the facts that matter. Sign up for the free Mother Jones newsletter.


It’s hard to open a newspaper or switch on the TV news these days without getting an earful about “corporate synergy.” But when that synergy is between the tobacco industry and the media, don’t expect it to be front-page news.

A 1985 document unearthed in the Minnesota attorney general’s tobacco lawsuit shows how the lure of advertising revenue can compromise news coverage of tobacco issues. The paper, from the files of tobacco giant Philip Morris, is titled “The Perspective of PM International on Smoking and Health Issues: Text of the discussion document used at the meeting of top management.”

That “discussion document” is a memo from Hamish Maxwell, a former Philip Morris chief executive, which outlines a broad strategy to shape public opinion in the company’s favor. Maxwell urges that Philip Morris use its “very considerable clout with the media,” who “like the money they make from our advertisements.” He names Rupert Murdoch and Malcolm Forbes as media proprietors “sympathetic to our position.”

In an appendix to the memo, another Philip Morris executive emphasizes the point, using Murdoch as the model for tobacco-media relations: “Murdoch’s papers rarely publish anti-smoking articles these days.”

Ancient history? Well, Rupert Murdoch is now on the board of Philip Morris, where he has held a seat since 1989. Hamish Maxwell is no longer top dog at the company, but Geoffrey Bible is, and Bible was voted onto the board of Murdoch’s News Corporation on June 23 of this year — an event which received virtually no media coverage.

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Or at least we hope. It’s fall fundraising time, and we’re trying to raise $250,000 to help fund Mother Jones’ journalism during a shorter than normal three-week push.

If you’re reading this, a fundraising pitch at the bottom of an article, you must find our team’s reporting valuable and we hope you’ll consider supporting it with a donation of any amount right now if you can.

It’s really that simple. But if you’d like to read a bit more, our membership lead, Brian Hiatt, has a post for you highlighting some of our newsroom's impressive, impactful work of late—including two big investigations in just one day and covering voting rights the way it needs to be done—that we hope you'll agree is worth supporting.

payment methods

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Or at least we hope. It’s fall fundraising time, and we’re trying to raise $250,000 to help fund Mother Jones’ journalism during a shorter than normal three-week push.

If you’re reading this, a fundraising pitch at the bottom of an article, you must find our team’s reporting valuable and we hope you’ll consider supporting it with a donation of any amount right now if you can.

It’s really that simple. But if you’d like to read a bit more, our membership lead, Brian Hiatt, has a post for you highlighting some of our newsroom's impressive, impactful work of late—including two big investigations in just one day and covering voting rights the way it needs to be done—that we hope you’ll agree is worth supporting.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate