Unlawful Entry

How one woman went from filling out an offer for coupons to getting harassed by a convicted rapist.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Protecting your privacy isn’t always as easy as withholding your phone number from the Radio Shack cashier. And the consequences of lost privacy can be greater than just a pile of junk mail. Just ask Beverly Dennis. The Ohio grandmother’s ordeal began with a customer questionnaire and ended with a sexually explicit letter from a convicted burglar and rapist in Texas who wanted to make her “desires and fantasies become a fulfilled reality.”

Exactly how it happened is a cautionary tale for any U.S. consumer. In 1994, as reported by Newsday, Dennis received a notice from Metromail that offered coupons and free samples to those who took the time to fill out an enclosed customer survey. It asked questions about magazines of interest, preferred products, income level, and marital status. Metromail uses such surveys to help keep its databases fresh—databases which contain information on more than 90 percent of America’s households. Dennis, who was just looking to save money at the grocery store, filled out the form and mailed it in.

But when Metromail received Dennis’ survey, and those of thousands of others, things took a turn. Instead of paying a reputable company to enter the information into Metromail’s databases, the direct-mail giant contacted the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and got a deal on prison-labor data entry—a full one-third to one-half cheaper than commercial rates. Soon Dennis’ survey was in the hands of Hal Parfait, a convicted rapist and burglar serving time at the Wynne Unit state prison in Huntsville. Parfait used Dennis’ personal information to write her a lengthy and very graphic letter, offering to make her “sexual desires and fantasies become a fulfilled reality. If you are into sixty-nine, then I am definitely game.” Parfait also said that he wanted “to be there to rub in your Neutrogena” and perform other specific sex acts, and that while his wishes could “only be in letters at the moment; maybe later, I can get over to see you.”

Fortunately for Beverly Dennis, it hasn’t yet come to that. But Parfait is scheduled to be released in September 1998 at the latest, and he knows where she lives.

To some readers, the moral of the story may be: Don’t give away personal information to an unknown source. But it’s not always that easy to control. Often companies like Metromail get their information in more subtle ways. For example, says Evan Hendricks of the Privacy Times, it could begin with something as small as filling out a warranty card on a new stereo you have just purchased.

Upon receiving the card, the stereo company will promptly enter your information into their database. And even if it is careful about who types in the information, there is no guarantee that the information will stay there. The list is a commodity for the company, which can turn around and sell your name to any of scores of specialty magazines or companies that make products to complement your stereo. And these companies could turn around and sell it again. Each time a list is sold, the odds that someone like Parfait will get ahold of it increase geometrically.

Right now, Dennis is in the midst of a class-action suit against Metromail, the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, and others. Her complaint in the case makes it clear just how big the problem is. The Metromail survey wasn’t the only bit of information floating through inmates’ hands; according to the complaint, Metromail also used the Texas prison facilities to process data for Coca-Cola, R.J. Reynolds, Phillip Morris, Time-Life, L’Oreal, Days Inn, Six Flags—and Seventeen magazine.

 

Want to keep your private information private? A tip: Most warranties are still valid even if you haven’t filled out the card. Just keep your receipt.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate