The Telecom Reform Act: Rhetoric vs. Reality

Fight disinformation. Get a daily recap of the facts that matter. Sign up for the free Mother Jones newsletter.


More than a year has gone by since President Clinton signed 1996’s Telecommunications Reform Act, which he claimed would “ bring the future to our doorstep.” The lower prices and more widespread access to telecom services promised by the act still haven’t materialized, but threats of Internet and television censorship continue to loom in our future.

The Telecom Act calls for governmental deregulation of the telecommunications industry, in the hopes that competition between companies will lower prices and improve the quality of service. But so far it seems only to have led to the concentration of media ownership through a series of mega-mergers.

The act also contains a universal service provision which insures high-grade, affordable service for low-income households, consumers in rural and other expensive areas, and public organizations (schools, libraries and health care providers). Unfortunately, there has yet to be a change in the universal service offered by companies; they currently only discount voice-quality telephone lines, not Internet access or higher bandwidth lines.

Finally, many still fear that the Telecom Act will lead to widespread media censorship with its regulation of the Internet’s content (a la the Communications Decency Act) and implementation of the V-Chip rating system on all new televisions.

To find out more about what the Telecom Reform Act promised, and what it has — and hasn’t — done so far, join NetAction and the Center for Educational Priorities in a month-long protest, as they demand that the Telecom Act is implemented for the true benefit of the public. You can also e-mail the FCC at vchip@fcc.gov with your views about the V-Chip.

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Or at least we hope. It’s fall fundraising time, and we’re trying to raise $250,000 to help fund Mother Jones’ journalism during a shorter than normal three-week push.

If you’re reading this, a fundraising pitch at the bottom of an article, you must find our team’s reporting valuable and we hope you’ll consider supporting it with a donation of any amount right now if you can.

It’s really that simple. But if you’d like to read a bit more, our membership lead, Brian Hiatt, has a post for you highlighting some of our newsroom's impressive, impactful work of late—including two big investigations in just one day and covering voting rights the way it needs to be done—that we hope you'll agree is worth supporting.

payment methods

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Or at least we hope. It’s fall fundraising time, and we’re trying to raise $250,000 to help fund Mother Jones’ journalism during a shorter than normal three-week push.

If you’re reading this, a fundraising pitch at the bottom of an article, you must find our team’s reporting valuable and we hope you’ll consider supporting it with a donation of any amount right now if you can.

It’s really that simple. But if you’d like to read a bit more, our membership lead, Brian Hiatt, has a post for you highlighting some of our newsroom's impressive, impactful work of late—including two big investigations in just one day and covering voting rights the way it needs to be done—that we hope you’ll agree is worth supporting.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate