The Less You Know: From Einstein to Aniston

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


In an NBC public service announcement, “Friends” star Jennifer Aniston peeks from beneath her trademark fringe and asks, “Why you should stay in school? Smart is sexier than stupid any day.” Clever, huh? Compare it to a 1923 PSA, in which “Betty Boop” creator Max Fleischer animated Einstein’s theory of relativity. After that, PSAs regularly addressed social issues of the day, but ’80s deregulation, media mergers, and greater competition led to today’s network-produced spots, which highlight the actor more than the message. The next generation of boob-tube junkies may know the names of more stars than the editors of People, but will they give a hoot?

1923 Fleischer’s short film, shown newsreel-style to American movie audiences, explains Einstein’s theory about how light curves around warps in space/time.

1942 The advertising industry’s War Advertising Council spends $300 million from 1942 to 1945 to improve the image of big business by supporting the war effort.

1945 Declaring “the war never stopped, only the enemy has changed,” the Ad Council launches print and radio campaigns for social issues. Its most enduring creation, Smokey Bear, now has his own Web site and is recognized by nearly 90 percent of Americans.

1950s TV networks begin broadcasting PSAs, many of which decry communism. A threat to America? Maybe. To business and advertisers? Most definitely.

1963 PSAs push social issues, but the Ad Council forgoes running anti-smoking PSAs. The American Cancer Society creates its own spots.

1970s PSAs reach their high-water mark with Chief Iron Eyes Cody, who tugs at heartstrings with his lone tear over litter, and with ABC’s animated “Schoolhouse Rock.” Created because an ad executive’s son could remember Rolling Stones’ lyrics but not his multiplication tables, ditties like “I’m Just a Bill” are implanted into the minds of a generation.

1980s Reagan’s FCC deregulates the industry, watering down requirements for public affairs programming. “Schoolhouse Rock” dies. Nancy’s “Just Say No” mantra is born.

1992-96 Leading a PSA renaissance, young ABC executives revive “Schoolhouse Rock,” though with only two spots per Saturday. Meanwhile, NBC’s ubiquitous “The More You Know” series highlights its “hot” stars.

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate