Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Name: Patricia Campbell

CLAIM TO FAME: As Miss Teen Pennsylvania, she criticized welfare reforms.

Broadcast between the Republican and the Democratic conventions, the Miss Teen USA beauty pageant should have been an amusing diversion from election-year politics. Yet, in what might be the ultimate condemnation of the state of democratic dialogue, 18-year-old Patricia Campbell, Miss Teen Pennsylvania, sashayed onstage in a white evening gown and critiqued President Clinton’s approval of welfare reforms with more uncensored spunk than anyone at either convention.

Most of Campbell’s peers at the pageant stuck with benign topics, such as animal rights and anything having to do with children. “There are really bright girls, but the majority are somewhat vapid and don’t have any concerns about what’s going on outside their little lives,” says a pageant organizer.

But as one of three finalists asked the question, “If you could talk with the president about the problems facing teenagers, what would you want to discuss?” Campbell eschewed tried-and-true responses, such as “teenage AIDS and the need for abstinence” (advocated by eventual winner Christie Lee Woods, Miss Teen Texas). Instead, she answered, “I’d want to discuss the welfare [reform] that President Clinton has created. I think he really should have looked into it more before he signed it. He’s signing off on women who [now have to] leave their children without a national daycare program.”

Sound tame? Campbell actually said more about the welfare bill than the woman charged with dealing with its human fallout: Health and Human Services Secretary Donna Shalala, who spoke at the Democratic convention.

“I/m not the type of person to stand by if I disapprove of something,” says Campbell, who is taking a semester off before she enters Clark Atlanta University in Georgia to study broadcast journalism. “I think I represented the real issues of my community and my state very well by answering as I did.” Even if all that truth-telling might have cost her the tiara and more than $150,000 in cash and prizes? “If I believe something, I’m going to say it, regardless of what I’m going to gain or lose in return.”

Know of any people who are raising a bit of hell? E-mail hellraiser@motherjones.com

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate