The Ice Man: Harold & Annette Simmons

Under investigation by the SEC, the FBI, and the FTC, this billionaire decided to take on the FEC

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Harold & Annette Simmons: Dallas, Texas, $124,230. Party: R

When, in the late ’80s, corporate takeover artist Harold C. Simmons, 64, found himself under investigation by the SEC, the FBI, and the FTC, he decided to fight back. Simmons told the Los Angeles Times that it was at that point that he “started spending money and doing some lobbying [himself] in Washington. That’s what you’ve got to do to defend yourself.”

The “Ice Man,” as he is known by his corporate colleagues, began to defend himself with such zeal–$125,000 to Gingrich’s GOPAC, $25,000 to Dole’s Better America Fund, etc.–that in 1993 the Federal Election Commission found Simmons guilty of violating federal campaign contribution laws. Specifically, in ’88 and ’89 Simmons exceeded the yearly $25,000 contribution limit. Simmons was fined $19,800, hardly a deterrent to someone whose estimated worth tops $1.8 billion.

Simmons’ most recent giving pattern shows a new strategy: Instead of flagrantly donating more than the $1,000 limit to a single candidate in one election cycle–as Simmons did in 1990 when he gave $6,000 to Sen. Jesse Helms (R-N.C.)–the Ice Man recruits help from his family.

In the 1991-92 campaign cycle, Simmons gave $5,000 each to four of his favorite PACs: NL Industries PAC, Baroid PAC, Contran PAC, and the Small Biz PAC. Simmons’ wife Annette also gave $5,000 each to the four PACs, as did Simmons’ four daughters, Andrea, Serena, Lisa, and Scheryle. All of these contributions were made on the same dates.

And, to make the giving even cozier, Simmons owns three of the four PACs, enabling him to control which candidates get funded by his (and his family’s) money. In the 1993-94 election cycle, for example, the Simmons family and PACs doled out $16,500 to Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchinson (R-Texas); $7,000 to Sen. Michael DeWine (R-Ohio); and $6,000 to Ollie North, for his failed senatorial campaign in Virginia.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate