MotherEarth Problems & possibilities 1995

Despite the apocalyptic terms that often frame the environmental debate, we believe there is hope, if sometimes only diverse glimmers, that grassroots energy and creativity can help us face our challenges. MoJo’s review of the State of the Earth offers a snapshot of our problems, their impact, and potential solutions. A thought for Earth Day 1995: Even if we don’t take responsibility for the planet, the earth will go on without us. Environmentalism is human self-preservation, for us and for future generations.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Agriculture

KEY PROBLEM:
The promise is fading that a “Green Revolution” will feed the world. Use of fertilizers, pesticides, new plant strains, and irrigation have increased production per acre, but there are big drawbacks–e.g., fertilizers pollute and pests evolve too quickly for pesticides.
IMPACT:
Increasing hunger by 2050, when soaring population growth is expected to triple the global demand for food.
ENCOURAGING SIGN:
Several groups, including the Land Institute in Salina, Kan., are pioneering sustainable farming practices to reduce soil erosion and chemical contamination.

Water

KEY PROBLEM:
The earth’s water is 97 percent saline; most of the rest is snow and ice. Fresh water is distributed unevenly and is increasingly polluted; its capture carries environmental costs.
IMPACT:
Today, at least a billion people lack clean water, most of them in rural areas. From 1950 to 1990 global water use doubled, leading to more dams, river diversions, and depletion of aquifers.
ENCOURAGING SIGN:
More than 2,000 groups in 43 countries support the Manibeli Declaration to block World Bank funding for destructive dams.

Toxics

KEY PROBLEM:
Toxic waste levels are not expected to decrease as the global economy grows fivefold by 2055. The U.S. is the largest producer of industrial materials–and probably toxic waste.
IMPACT:
Hazards include increasing reproductive failure, impaired development of the young, and genetic alteration.
ENCOURAGING SIGN:
A German entrepreneur is working with Volkswagen and other manufacturers to build products, from cars to VCRs to detergent, out of reusable components.

Energy

KEY PROBLEM:
Analysts now say that the supply of fossil fuels may last another 300 years–but these resources are not renewable, and their extraction and use cause environmental damage. Nuclear power is not a viable alternative, given its costs, risks, and waste disposal problems.
IMPACT:
Oil’s low cost hinders conservation pressure and slows the development of renewable energy sources, such as wind, solar, hydro, and geothermal.
ENCOURAGING SIGN:
Over the past decade, more than 250,000 homes in the developing world have added rooftop solar systems.

Forests

KEY PROBLEM:
Experts estimate that forests lost in the 1980s would cover an area twice the size of Texas, most in biologically rich tropical forests like those in Brazil and Indonesia. More forestland was degraded or fragmented.
IMPACT:
Extensive loss of habitat and biodiversity; exhaustion of a prime resource for energy, building construction, and paper.
ENCOURAGING SIGN:
Sustainable forestry is gaining momentum, from Mexico to Papua New Guinea. In the U.S., the number of acres of sustainably harvested forestland increased fourfold last year.

Biodiversity

KEY PROBLEM:
Many scientists warn that we are facing a major species die-off akin to the demise of the dinosaurs. Twelve percent of mammal species and 11 percent of bird species were classified as threatened in 1980.
IMPACT:
Failing ecosystems; loss of genetic diversity; the possibility that undiscovered cures from medicinal plants and animals will be lost forever.
ENCOURAGING SIGN:
The threatened extinction of Pacific coast salmon has united grassroots and government groups in a multitude of habitat restoration projects.

Atmosphere

KEY PROBLEM:
Greenhouse gases such as CO2 and methane rose steadily with industrialization. Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) also contribute to ozone loss. Current atmospheric chlorine levels are nearly six times normal and rising.
IMPACT:
Possibly a 26 percent increase in nonmelanoma skin cancers and untold damage to flora and fauna.
ENCOURAGING SIGN:
An international agreement requires industrial countries to phase out production of CFCs by 1996. CO2 and methane emissions began declining slightly in 1989.

Population

KEY PROBLEM:
The U.N. estimates the world’s population could climb from 5.6 to 9.8 billion by the year 2050, with the most rapid changes in urban areas, where population could triple because of global rural-to-urban migration.
IMPACT:
Escalating demand for resources; concomitant environmental destruction.
ENCOURAGING SIGN:
Current U.N. strategy seeks to reduce poverty, raise women’s status, and support family planning. More than 30,000 participants from around the world are expected in Beijing at this fall’s U.N. conference on women.

SOURCES: World Resources Institute; Pacific Institute; International Rivers Network; Worldwatch Institute; Ecotimber International; Energy and Resources Group at the University of California at Berkeley.

Research by Holly Lloyd with Liz Enochs, Jennifer Lind, and Justin Lowe
Research assistance by Lexis/Nexis

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE ON MOTHER JONES' FINANCES

We need to start being more upfront about how hard it is keeping a newsroom like Mother Jones afloat these days.

Because it is, and because we're fresh off finishing a fiscal year, on June 30, that came up a bit short of where we needed to be. And this next one simply has to be a year of growth—particularly for donations from online readers to help counter the brutal economics of journalism right now.

Straight up: We need this pitch, what you're reading right now, to start earning significantly more donations than normal. We need people who care enough about Mother Jones’ journalism to be reading a blurb like this to decide to pitch in and support it if you can right now.

Urgent, for sure. But it's not all doom and gloom!

Because over the challenging last year, and thanks to feedback from readers, we've started to see a better way to go about asking you to support our work: Level-headedly communicating the urgency of hitting our fundraising goals, being transparent about our finances, challenges, and opportunities, and explaining how being funded primarily by donations big and small, from ordinary (and extraordinary!) people like you, is the thing that lets us do the type of journalism you look to Mother Jones for—that is so very much needed right now.

And it's really been resonating with folks! Thankfully. Because corporations, powerful people with deep pockets, and market forces will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. Only people like you will.

There's more about our finances in "News Never Pays," or "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," and we'll have details about the year ahead for you soon. But we already know this: The fundraising for our next deadline, $350,000 by the time September 30 rolls around, has to start now, and it has to be stronger than normal so that we don't fall behind and risk coming up short again.

Please consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO, and Brian Hiatt, Online Membership Director

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate