Pilfering the right’s playbook

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Mention forming a progressive political party and even hard-core lefties roll their eyes: The historical landscape is littered with failed third-party movements and independent presidential bids. Nevertheless, after only two years of organizing (see MoJo’s “Who’s on third?” July/Aug. 1992), the New Party has harnessed enough optimism among veteran activists and ordinary citizens to form chapters and run candidates in 10 states.

Pilfering from the playbook of the Christian right, the New Party is targeting local races for school board, city council, and state legislature. Wary of alienating itself from the liberal mainstream, the party occasionally endorses progressive Democrats or runs its own candidates as Democrats. “We want to build the organization strong enough to have real clout inside the Democratic party, but also have a credible threat of exit,” says Field Director Suzanne Wall. Thus far, 30 of the 45 candidates endorsed by local chapters have won; the highest New Party officeholder sits in the Wisconsin state legislature.

The New Party contrasts its bottom-up strategy with Ross Perot’s top-down politics of personality. Current party activists who were involved in Jesse Jackson’s presidential forays learned that even a high level of progressive energy dissipates quickly without a durable base capable of picking up where a defeated candidate leaves off.

Along with targeting a host of races in the fall, New Party chapters in Missouri, Montana, and Washington, D.C., are working with other organizations to pass campaign finance reform initiatives, one of many “tools of democracy” it considers essential to its success.

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate