MotherJones MJ93: America in the nineties: the new hucksterism

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


To the new shills, nothing’s sacred. Penn State signs a $14 million deal to make Pepsi the official drink on campus. The nutrition exhibit at the Chicago Museum of Science features Swift meats and not a bad word about cholesterol. Pet-food marketers try to develop a high- pitched whistle that calls the family dog to television ads. Cineplex Odeon guarantees its ad buyers “No zipping or zapping . . . a captive movie audience.” Privy Promotions sold restroom ads for $2,000 a square foot, promising “long lines of consumers . . . staring at the wall anywhere from three to five minutes.” Students in a California high school “earned” higher grades for spending money at a local supermarket, which offers the school computers in exchange.

In place of George Bush’s “military renaissance,” we now have a renaissance of the Rotarians. Today’s Babbits have read Robert Reich and are going global.

The new tone was set as early as that ultimate Rotary Club luncheon, Clinton’s preinaugural economic summit. A misty-eyed Jill Barad, president of Mattel, spoke of wanting “toys to be accessible to all families and all children in the United States,” and proudly noted that “it wasn’t until we went to lower-cost sources that we were able to dominate the worldwide toy market.” Though she ex-pressed concern over the human-rights situation in China, she pointed out that “it would be very, very difficult to maintain that competitive edge if we were to withdraw Most Favored Nation status with China.”

When Clinton all but guaranteed MFN for Mattel’s cheap crew of Barbie builders, Jill Barad, very nineties, did not light up a cigar.

Make-a-buck smarm, of course, has long threatened to engulf American culture. But Barad’s “toys are us, gulags are them” logic had that upbeat “competitiveness” ring to it. If Mattel gets its way in China, she said, “we [can] hire and employ thousands of U.S. workers in high-wage, high-value jobs.” Clinton and Reich have been saying similar things for so long–the global economy, stupid!–that it feels like we’ve all been through one of those lean and mean, you-will- have-eight-jobs-in-your-life management seminars.

Months after the December summit we still “are not having the kind of conversation we need,” says Christopher Lasch, noted skeptic of progress. “The meaning of life is to be sought in useful, self- respecting work. But the so-called good jobs increasingly are devoted to the manufacture, design, and promotion of things we don’t need.

“You can’t afford to have a sense of the sacred,” Lasch continues, “in a society where the powers that must be propitiated are not the unseen forces of the heavens or earth, but the people on Wall Street.”

The renaissance of the military may indeed be over. No more Star Wars economy, no more Super Bowl halftime bombing raids. The question is, how to pay for the last renaissance and make the next one a little more dignified? How about a “shill tax” on the $130 billion that American business pours into advertising every year? That might crimp our world dominance in shameless hucksterism, but we may have lost that already. After all, it’s the biggest bank in the world, Japan’s DKB, that claims a heart for its logo.

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate