Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


There used to be a joke that an aspirin could keep you from getting pregnant — if you held it between your knees. Now there’s a new twist: birth control pills can help you get pregnant — if you take them as part of one of AID’s Third World “contraceptive inundation” programs.

The inundation strategy means that every woman can get pills, whether she needs them or not. About 90 percent of the women receiving AID pills in Bangladesh are lactating, and these women do not need pills. Lactation suppresses ovulation in most women and can help prevent pregnancy for as long as 18 to 22 months after childbirth. The pill, however, can interfere with this natural occurrence. Scientists have reported that irregular use of the pill during lactation may actually stimulate ovulation and cause an early return to fertility. If you consider the pill’s side effects — dizziness, headaches and depression — it’s easy to understand why pill use among Bangladeshi women is often highly irregular.

Dr. Henry Mosely, a Johns Hopkins University professor, who has studied AID’s inundation approach in Bangladesh, believes that the possibility of a pill-induced population explosion is “a matter of some concern.” But AID’s Dr. R. T. Ravenholt, father of the inundation strategy, does not worry about it. “We supply an unlimited amount of free pills. As long as they’re taking the pills, they can’t get pregnant.”

AID may have the last word anyway: the agency is the sole source of funding for the Census Bureau’s international head counts. In 1977, Rep. Frederick Richmond (D-NY) charged AID with suppressing data unflattering to its programs.

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate