The Democratic Bill Even Ted Cruz and Rand Paul Support

So where’s Obama?


On last night’s episode of Full Frontal With Samantha Bee, the host took on sexual assault in the military, a serious problem that the Pentagon has only reluctantly acknowledged. Later this week, the Senate will vote on the National Defense Authorization Act, or, as Bee puts it, “when America takes all the money and…gives it to the military,” which then does not use much of it to prosecute sexual offenders.

According to a Department of Defense survey from 2014, only 6,131 reports were filed out of 20,300 cases of sexual assault. The enormous gap in assaults and filed reports stems from the difficult process members of the military must go through to report having been assaulted. Victims must first tell their units’ commanders, who are also often the commanders of the alleged perpetrators. Further complicating the matter is that for these commanders to prove an assault has occurred, they must also admit a failure of their own leadership. As Bee points out, “commanders can’t indict a rapist without indicting themselves.” That might explain why servicemen and servicewomen who do report an assault are 12 times more likely to suffer some form of retaliation than to see their offender convicted of sexual offense. 

Enter New York Sen. Kristen Gillibrand, who has spent the last three years trying to get the Military Justice Improvement Act passed in Congress. The measure would take the responsibility of determining the validity of a reported assault out of commanders’ hands and move the matter to the jurisdiction of military prosecutors. In an unexpected legislative plot twist—what Bee calls “the rare, majestic bipartisan bill”—two of its supporters are former GOP presidential hopefuls: Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky and Ted Cruz of Texas.

So why has the bill stalled? Not just because Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) suggested that military commanders would be replaced with lawyers, but because President Barack Obama has not endorsed it.

“If the president came out and supported this bill, it would be done,” Gillibrand told Bee. “It would be over. He promised, I think now close to three years ago, that he was going to give the military one year to fix things. Well, I can show him this year’s report…They have not fixed things.”

Bee asks the question we’re all left to ponder: “I know presidents don’t like to piss off generals, but what happened to ‘No Fucks Obama?'”

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate