Another Enclosed Mall Bites the Dust

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


This is a few days old, but here’s some local news I just ran across:

About half of Laguna Hills Mall will be demolished and converted into an open-air shopping corridor as part of a radical overhaul, according to plans submitted to the city by Merlone Geier Partners, the mall’s new owner. The planned three-year revamp is designed to boost foot traffic at the struggling mall. Sales tax revenue for the center dropped to a seven-year low of $1.4 million last year, from $1.8 million in 2005, according to city records.

This is, obviously, part of the trend away from enclosed malls and toward open-air shopping centers that’s been going on for the past two decades. But it’s a little more dramatic when you actually demolish an already-existing mall in order to convert it to open-air shopping.

I think I’ve asked about this before, but I’m going to ask again anyway: does anyone know why open-air malls have become so popular? I can sort of understand it in a place like Southern California, where the weather is pretty good, but only sort of. Albert Hammond to the contrary, it does rain in Southern California, and sometimes it’s hot and sometimes it’s windy and cold. And the rest of the country is mostly worse: who wants to go to a mall during a snowstorm?

I suppose the obvious answer is just that fashions change. Enclosed malls came to seem sterile and dead, and the consuming public was in the mood for something new. But is that all there is to it? Or was there something more going on?

UPDATE: We don’t really have any kind of firm consensus on this, but this is nonetheless the winning comment so far:

Goldman Sachs probably has a huge position in Westfield and wants to tear down malls and rebuild them so it can move some of its aluminum.

OK, probably not. But it’s possible that outdoor malls are cheaper to build and maintain and therefore more profitable. However, a bit of googling suggests that the primary dynamic here is the demise of department stores, which were always the traditional anchors of enclosed malls, and the rise of “category killer” stores like Home Depot and CostCo and Toys R Us, which are better suited to freestanding structures with nearby parking.

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate