Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Stuart Staniford reprinted a chart today showing the improvement in gas mileage of American cars since World War II. He’s not happy with the progress we’ve made:

You can see that fuel economy drifted up slowly from the forties to the early seventies, barely accelerated at all in response to the first oil shock in 1973, then took off upwards after the second oil shock in 1979, improving several percent per year through the eighties. Then it went into gradual drift again in the early nineties.

It seems abundantly clear that the US is going to have to improve its fuel economy at a faster rate in the future to cope with rapid increases in emerging market demand in an oil constrained world. It would have been better if people had done this proactively. However, it appears that it’s going to take a bigger, meaner, oil shock to get people moving in the right direction.

But was it really the oil shock of 1979 that prompted a big increase in auto efficiency? Here’s a look at the chart, but with a chart of oil prices overlaid on top of it:

Certainly the price of oil has an effect on consumer behavior, but it really doesn’t seem to be the prime motivator here. In 1973 the price of oil skyrockets, but mileage goes nowhere. In 1979 there’s another shock and mileage goes up. Then in 1985 oil prices plummet but mileage keeps going up. Finally, in 2003, oil prices go up again but mileage doesn’t react at all. (And it continued not to react even when prices continued to rise for the next five years.)

There’s something else that explains this chart much better: the introduction of CAFE mileage standards. They take effect in 1978 and within a couple of years you see the first real spike in average mileage. CAFE standards keep rising until around 1987, and for a few years after that mileage keeps going up while new cars continue to replace old pre-CAFE cars. Then mileage plateaus. In every single year outside the CAFE era, absolutely nothing happens: mileage drifts ever so slightly upward and that’s it.

Price signals do matter — which is why a carbon tax or a cap-and-trade system would help reduce fossil fuel usage — but for something like gasoline they need to be large and persistent to really have any effect. That’s why I like to think of them as similar to a tailwind: nice to have, but not always the prime motivating force. If you really want something to happen, sometimes you still need good old command-and-control regulation. Luckily, between 2011 and 2016 CAFE standards are finally set to go up again. High gas prices will help motivate people to buy high mileage cars, but it’s CAFE standards that are going to make the real difference.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate