Taxes, Cost Controls, and Medicare

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Speaking of fiscal reality, Austin Frakt reminds us that the federal budget, including Medicare, is actually in pretty good shape if we follow current law. Here’s the CBO’s projection of the primary budget (i.e., excluding interest payments):

Are Democrats willing to raise taxes in order to fund Medicare? Austin: “I do recall quite a vociferous debate over just this issue. Did Americans fail to notice that the health reform law spends a lot of money and includes a lot of tax increases? If so, that’s not just a Democratic messaging problem, but a Republican one too, and a general media failure. What more would it take to communicate this?”

Now, this CBO projection is one that assumes we follow current law. That is, we let the Bush tax cuts expire, we stop passing the doc fix, estate taxes revert to their 2009 levels, and we actually allow both the cost control mechanisms and tax increases of PPACA to take effect. As it happens, the estate tax has already been changed to rates slightly below the 2009 levels, but that has a pretty minor effect on things. The only one of these items that’s both significant and hard to imagine staying in place is the end of the doc fix. This means the budget isn’t quite as balanced as this chart suggests.

Still, even if we modify physician payments, we’re in decent shape as long as we have the discipline to let current law take its course, including both its tax increases and its cost controls. Toss in a compromise Social Security fix and we’d be in better long-term shape yet. So what’s wrong with this picture?

More detail here from Ezra Klein in word form rather than chart form.

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

A BETTER WAY TO DO THIS?

We have an ambitious $350,000 online fundraising goal this month and we can't afford to come up short. But when a reader recently asked how being a nonprofit makes Mother Jones different from other news organizations, we realized we needed to lay this out better: Because "in absolutely every way" is essentially the answer.

So we tried to explain why your year-end donations are so essential, and we'd like your help refining our pitch about what make Mother Jones valuable and worth reading to you.

We'd also like your support of our journalism with a year-end donation if you can right now—all online gifts will be doubled until we hit our $350,000 goal thanks to an incredibly generous donor's matching gift pledge.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate