Health Group Accuses Canadian Gas Association of Greenwashing

Trade group’s claim that methane is “clean” has sparked an official probe.

From the Canadian Gas Association's ad campaign "Fuelling Canada."Photo captured from Fuelling Canada website homepage

This story was originally published by Canada’s National Observer and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.

A prominent gas industry lobby group is being investigated by Canada’s Competition Bureau for alleged greenwashing one month after health-care workers raised the alarm over one of its advertising campaigns.

“This is groundbreaking,” said Dr. Melissa Lem, spokesperson for the Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (CAPE), the group that filed the complaint against the Canadian Gas Association (CGA). ‘It’s the first time that the gas industry is being investigated by the Competition Bureau for misleading claims.”

The Competition Bureau’s decision to open a file, announced by CAPE on November 10, comes just one month after environmentalists successfully applied for the bureau to investigate RBC for allegedly misleading Canadians about its climate performance.

The complaint filed against CGA centers on an ad campaign from last November called “Fuelling Canada,” which presents so-called natural gas as “clean” and “affordable” when, in reality, the gas is mostly made up of a potent greenhouse gas called methane that does more damage to the planet in the short-term than carbon dioxide. The campaign has a website and ran on social media, including Facebook, Instagram and Twitter.

Because methane is 25 to 80 times more powerful at trapping heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide, it is misleading to describe it as “clean,” the complaint argued. It also took issue with ads calling the fuel “affordable” given that heat pumps are generally cheaper to use and gas is expected to become more expensive than other energy options as economies transition to low-carbon options.

If the inquiry confirms CGA’s statements are misleading and false, the association and its member companies—including Enbridge, TC Energy, FortisBC, Énergir, and about a dozen others—would be forced to stop advertising methane gas as “clean” and “affordable,” issue a retraction, and possibly face a $10 million (Canadian) fine, the CAPE press release stated.

In an emailed statement to Canada’s National Observer, CGA’s president and CEO Timothy M. Egan said the association “will co-operate with the Competition Bureau and is confident in its position.”

From the “Fuelling Canada” campaign.

Canadian Gas Association Facebook page

“Natural gas plays an important part in Canada’s energy mix, meeting 38 per cent of Canadians’ energy needs, a number that is growing,” the statement reads. “Canadians need access to energy they can count on, and natural gas meets that need.”

The bureau’s decision to investigate both CGA and RBC indicates increasing scrutiny on fossil-fuel disinformation and net-zero claims but also reveals broader regulation is needed to tackle the scale of this problem, said the CAPE press release.

Greenwashing is also front and center at COP27 thanks to the release of a new UN report outlining what a credible net-zero commitment must look like, so the bureau’s decision “couldn’t have come at a better time,” said Lem.

Canadian doctors and health workers have been leading a crusade against fossil-fuel advertising and have called on the federal government to ban and regulate fossil-fuel advertising—similar to the tobacco industry—given the impacts on air quality and human health.

“These misleading claims, unfortunately, are driving demand,” said Lem. Consumers want to buy products that are affordable and environmentally friendly, and the industry knows this, she added, hence the targeted messaging. The industry has a well-documented history of using its vast resources to deny the existence of climate change. “Now that it’s clear it does (exist) … they’re now switching to the strategy to greenwash instead,” said Lem.

For the world to have a shot at limiting global warming to 1.5 C, Canada and other wealthy fossil-fuel-producing nations must stop all production by 2034, according to a report published in March by the International Institute for Sustainable Development. Contrary to the findings of that report and several others, Canada will continue to increase oil and gas production.

As the industry is doing everything it can to perpetuate demand for fossil fuels, “we have to be smarter than that,” said Lem. “We have to protect consumers by making sure that these misleading claims don’t drive demand.”

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate