Obama’s Drug Czar Cites Useless Stat to Dismiss Legalizing Pot

<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/cat.mhtml?lang=en&search_source=search_form&version=llv1&anyorall=all&safesearch=1&searchterm=marijuana+violence&search_group=#id=797136&src=2FsHU2u2ehnGxFwih4k0vw-1-15">Devin Koob</a>/Shutterstock

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Gil Kerlikowske, director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), dismissed calls for pot legalization on Thursday, citing a recent study by his agency to claim that marijuana is the drug most commonly linked to crime. During an Urban Institute panel discussion, while calling for a “21st century approach to drug policy reform,” Kerlikowske rejected legalization as a “bumper-sticker approach.” But the study (PDF) doesn’t actually show a causal relationship between pot and crime: Marijuana is far and away the most commonly used illegal drug, so it stands to reason that it would show up most often in drug tests.

Beyond that, the study’s data is based on self-reported drug use, meaning that arrestees were only given urine samples if they admitted to lighting up within the past month. Pot can be detected in an infrequent user’s urine up to about a week; for daily users, it can stick around for a month. In other words, the study doesn’t show whether people accused of crimes were actually on drugs at the time of their arrest.

Pot, and pot withdrawal, can result in symptoms that might lead to aggressive behavior. But, as everyone knows, people tend to smoke pot to chill out—even the federal government has done studies affirming its relaxing effects on people undergoing cancer treatment. Pot doesn’t lend itself to criminal behavior in the same way as, say, alcohol: In 2008, nearly 20 percent of assault victims reported that their attackers appeared to be drunk.

Last week, former President Jimmy Carter reversed course on his support for ballot initiatives that have made pot legal in Colorado and Washington. During a meeting with lawmakers and regulators from the two states, Carter said that “we must do everything we can to discourage marijuana use, as we do now with tobacco and excessive drinking.” That same day, the anti-legalization group Smart Approaches to Marijuana, which was co-founded by a former ONDCP employee, issued a press release commending Carter for embracing the group’s mental health and rehabilitation approach to pot.

Kerlikowske touted a similar “smart on crime” approach—rehabilitation over incarceration—on Thursday. That’s certainly a step in the right direction, but it still paints pot smokers with a broad brush as drug abusers who need help to get their lives back on track. What would Barry Obama have had to say about that?

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate