Equal Opportunity Guns

Flickr/<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/64707145@N00/2547371884/" target="_blank"> f_mafra</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


I’ve never held, owned, or even seen a real gun in person, save for the time one was pointed at me and my mom during a drive-by robbery when I was about six years old. So when I saw copies of The Politically Corrected Glossary at the 25th annual Gun Rights Policy Conference, I’ll admit I got nervous. Here’s an excerpt of the entry that did it:

Gun Bigot: A person who hates guns. Typically has little or no knowledge of guns, may never have even fired one, certainly doesn’t have any. Would gladly subject innocent people to defenselessness. An elitist.

It goes on, but here’s the kicker:

Striking similarity and disturbing parallels with the racial bigotry of the civil rights efforts since the 1960s.

What’s up with everyone from Glenn Beck to the anti-gun regulation fold trying to appropriate the Black Civil Rights movement for their ends? Alan Gottlieb, the head of the organization that built the conference, at one point said “if the gun rights movement is going to be successful it has to model itself after the Civil Rights movement.” Later at the conference, John Lott, the author of More Guns, Less Crime, argued that gun regulations are discriminatory because they prevent “poor black people” from being able to arm themselves.

An alarm automatically goes off in my head when I hear old white dudes arguing firearm regulations are “elitist” and leave poor black people defenseless, especially considering that black people are more likely than whites to be both the victims of gun violence and, sadly, the offenders (PDF). (Black people experience higher rates of overall violence than any other group). In effect, less gun regulations would lead to more black people shooting black people. So wouldn’t those who claim to have the welfare of black folks in mind actually want regulations to deter gun violence in this community? Also, besides me, only one other black person was spotted at this event which offered another source of skepticism at the advice offered. Where are the black pro-gun, anti-regulation advocates?

But reading The Politically Corrected Glossary did make me wonder: As a gun novice and one-time assault victim, do I have the right to critique gun owners, having never experienced firearms on a recreational level or for self-defense? After spending a total of 19 hours over one weekend with this crowd, some of whom have been shooting since age 14 or younger, I think I get it. Some are people who see shooting as a sport and want to have their guns. It’s the ones who want guns for self-defense I’m concerned with. You can read why here. Whether they see their gun as a hobby or a safety blanket, it doesn’t negate that guns should be heavily regulated—at least for the safety of the community at large, and definitely for the safety of the black community which many gun advocates voice so much concern for.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate