Was An Anti-Abortion Protestor Gunned Down For His Beliefs?

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


A 63-year-old anti-abortion protestor named James Pouillon was shot to death this morning outside a high school in Owosso, a small Michigan town not far from Flint. According to news reports, Pouillon—who was carrying graphic photos of aborted fetusus—died after being struck by multiple shots fired from a moving pick-up truck. Already, some pro-lifers have dubbed him a martyr, and Concerned Women for America wants Attorney General Eric Holder to acknowledge Pouillon’s death as he did the murder of abortion doctor George Tiller earlier this year. Details are still murky, but local authorities are saying that the alleged shooter was indeed motivated by Pouillon’s pro-life protests.

 

Police have charged Harlan James Drake, 33, with murdering both Pouillon and a second man. Shiawassee County Prosecutor Randy Colbry told reporters that Drake also planned to kill a third target but was arrested before he could do so. According to the Detroit Free Press, which has the most detailed account of the shootings so far:

Colbry said authorities do not believe that the two homicides and the third plot were related, saying “They stemmed from individual grievances Drake had with the victims.”

Colbry said the grievances were not known in detail, but that the killing of Mr. Puillon was related to the latter’s anti-abortion protest. But he said, “The defendant was offended by the manner of Mr. Pouillon’s message.”…

[Owosso Public Safety Director Mike Compeau] said it was not known what abortion views are held by the shooting suspect.

Google doesn’t yield much on Drake; I’ll update if new details emerge.

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate