Times Calls Out Spitzer’s Boo on Use of “Boo”

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.


Buried in the New York Timesouting of “Kristen”—a.k.a Ashley Alexandra Dupré—a.k.a. Eliot Spitzer’s boo—comes this strange line:

On [Dupré’s MySpace] Web page was a recording of what she described as her latest track, “What We Want,” an amateurish, hip-hop inflected rhythm and blues tune that asks, “Can you handle me, boy?” and used some dated slang, calling someone her “boo.”

Now, to pick apart this less than charitable and, frankly, catty article would take quite a while. But for now, let’s address the linguistic issue here. Opinion at MoJo tends toward “boo” being not only current, but timeless. Urban Dictionary traces the origins of “boo” all the way back to the adoption of the French “beau” at the time of Caribbean colonization. Fast forward a couple of centuries and Tupac deployed “boo” in “It Ain’t Easy” off his 1995 Me Against the World album. A full decade later, the term was still in use, as Usher’s “My Boo” (feat. Alicia Keys) won a Grammy for best R&B performance in 2005 (see below). The next year, Brooke Valentine sang “He can call me his boo / But he call me dope girl, cuz I got that oooh.” So it’s pretty clear “boo” is here to stay. But did anyone really trust the Times as an arbiter of slang?

—Justin Elliott

BEFORE YOU CLICK AWAY!

December is make or break for us. A full one-third of our annual fundraising comes in this month alone. A strong December means our newsroom is on the beat and reporting at full strength. A weak one means budget cuts and hard choices ahead.

The December 31 deadline is closing in fast. To reach our $400,000 goal, we need readers who’ve never given before to join the ranks of MoJo donors. And we need our steadfast supporters to give again today—any amount.

Managing an independent, nonprofit newsroom is staggeringly hard. There’s no cushion in our budget—no backup revenue, no corporate safety net. We can’t afford to fall short, and we can’t rely on corporations or deep-pocketed interests to fund the fierce, investigative journalism Mother Jones exists to do.

That’s why we need you right now. Please chip in to help close the gap.

BEFORE YOU CLICK AWAY!

December is make or break for us. A full one-third of our annual fundraising comes in this month alone. A strong December means our newsroom is on the beat and reporting at full strength. A weak one means budget cuts and hard choices ahead.

The December 31 deadline is closing in fast. To reach our $400,000 goal, we need readers who’ve never given before to join the ranks of MoJo donors. And we need our steadfast supporters to give again today—any amount.

Managing an independent, nonprofit newsroom is staggeringly hard. There’s no cushion in our budget—no backup revenue, no corporate safety net. We can’t afford to fall short, and we can’t rely on corporations or deep-pocketed interests to fund the fierce, investigative journalism Mother Jones exists to do.

That’s why we need you right now. Please chip in to help close the gap.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate