Why Has Only Hillary Clinton Turned Over All Her Emails?

Test Ticker

David Corn,
Washington, DC, bureau chief

Try my personal newsletter—for free.

Twice a week I email Our Land to a roster of special subscribers who pay $5/month to receive the story behind the headlines. But I’m offering you a 30-day free trial—with no strings attached—because I’m hoping that after you start reading Our Land you’ll be hooked.

Our Land unpacks the key events of the week and lets you in on what no one else in the media is telling you. It's fresh, fun, and unfiltered. If you have appreciated my journalism, my books, or my media appearances over the years, you’ll enjoy Our Land. Please give Our Land a shot today .

Try my personal newsletter—for free.

Twice a week I email Our Land to a roster of special subscribers who pay $5/month to receive the story behind the headlines. But I’m offering you a 30-day free trial—with no strings attached—because I’m hoping that after you start reading Our Land you’ll be hooked.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

I have a dumb question. Hillary Clinton has been forced, via FOIA request, to release all of her work-related emails from her term as Secretary of State. Today we learned there may be more to come. By the time it’s all over, we’ll have something like 30-40,000 emails that have been made public.

So here’s my dumb question: why has this happened only to Hillary Clinton? If FOIA can be used to force the release of every email sent or received by a cabinet member, why haven’t FOIA requests been submitted for all of them? It would certainly be interesting and newsworthy to see all of Leon Panetta’s emails. Or all of Condi Rice’s. Or all of Henry Paulson’s.

So what’s the deal? Why has this happened only to Hillary Clinton?