GOP Activists Oust Virginia Congressman After He Officiated a Same-Sex Wedding

The party’s new nominee opposes gay marriages and abortion without exceptions.

Caroline Brehman/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

An incumbent Republican member of Congress who officiated a same-sex wedding last year lost his party’s nomination on Saturday. Rep. Denver Riggleman was defeated by Bob Good, who has described himself as a “bright red Biblical and constitutional conservative,” in Virginia’s 5th district, which spans between the state’s northern and southern borders.

Riggleman, whose campaign for renomination was endorsed by President Donald Trump, drew the ire of social conservatives in Virginia after officiating at the wedding of two male, former campaign staffers last year. Local activists subsequently tried to censure him. Party leaders arranged to have the race decided by a drive-thru convention rather than a primary, collecting votes at just one location in a district whose size compares to the state of New Jersey; under 2,500 people participated.

“What does Denver stand for?” Good said during a radio debate last month. “What conservative Republican issue is he strong on?”

Riggleman, who was first elected to Congress in 2018, was perhaps best known for an incident during that race when his Democratic opponent tried to make issue of what she described as her opponent’s “Bigfoot erotica collection.” Now, Democrats see Riggleman’s ouster as a potential positive. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee had targeted the district in 2018, and is likely to do so again, reasoning Good’s ultra right-wing views could help create a new opportunity.

But the district, which Trump won by 11 points in 2016, might remain an uphill battle for Democrats, who will select their candidate on June 23. If Good wins the seat, Congress will gain a member who wants to end birthright citizenship, make English the national language, opposes gay marriage, and proposes a total abortion ban with no exceptions.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate