First Meeting of Trump Election Commission Focuses on Fraud, Not Access to Polls

The commission also appeared to downplay the risks posed by hacking.

Vice President Mike Pence and Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach.AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The first meeting of President Donald Trump’s election integrity commission on Wednesday was notable for the commissioners’ focus on voter fraud—and a complete absence of discussion of the obstacles keeping people from the polls.

Voting rights groups and election experts have warned that the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity has set out to create justifications to place new restrictions on registering to vote and casting a ballot. The commission’s first meeting is likely to amplify those concerns.

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, the commission’s vice chair, suggested five areas for the commission to investigate: accuracy of voter rolls, voter fraud, voting by mail and risk of fraud, cyber security regarding state voting systems, and voter intimidation. About the cyber security issue, arguably the most pressing after Russia breached systems in 39 states before the November elections, Kobach added, “We may potentially want to address, but we certainly don’t have to.”

Multiple civil rights groups have sued the commission in the last week, alleging, among other concerns, that the commission violated a federal open meeting law by holding its first organizational call without public notice. But in the first public meeting on Wednesday, which was livestreamed, Kobach raised the possibility that some of the commission’s deliberations should take place behind closed doors. He said that by publicly discussing vulnerabilities in election systems, the commission would give potential criminals a roadmap to commit fraud.

One Democrat on the commission, Alan King of Alabama, stressed that voting machines are growing old and must be replaced. Several other commissioners did not seem to share his concern, and another Democrat on the committee, New Hampshire Secretary of State Bill Gardner, expressed dismay at the idea of spending millions of dollars every decade to update voting machines because technology moves quickly. “Counties and states have to have this money,” King argued. “Things are going to go wrong. You need money to fix them.”

Christy McCormick, a Republican member, said she wanted the panel to investigate how voter crimes are identified and prosecuted. She noted that she has personally witnessed people impersonating others—prompting incredulous experts and reporters to wish she had given more details. 

Hans von Spakovsky, a former Justice Department lawyer who’s generated controversy with his activism on conservative voting priorities like voter ID laws, said the commission should ask the Department of Homeland Security for information from immigrant naturalization applications in order to get data on noncitizens who may be voting. As experts quickly noted, DHS is not legally allowed to share that information:

The commission adjourned Wednesday afternoon without more than a stray phrase about voter suppression, the impact of policies like ID requirements on minorities voters, or the threat posed by Russian hacking.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate