A Russian Diary: A Journalist’s Final Account of Life, Corruption, and Death in Putin’s Russia

By Anna Politkovskaya. <i>Random House</i>. 342 pages. $25.95.</p> <p>Politkovskaya is an erudite guide through the mess of modern Russia. Amid the diary’s pervasive gloom there are a few small flickers of hope.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Anna Politkovskaya’s reporting was never meant for beach reading. In A Russian Diary, the late investigative journalist, who was murdered last October outside her Moscow apartment, depicts life in Vladimir Putin’s Russia with some of the sweep of Tolstoy and a lot of the darkness of Dostoyevsky.

For those of us who have spent the last few years poring over news from the Middle East and ignoring the dragon in the Kremlin, Politkovskaya’s posthumous diary offers a welcome tutorial in recent Russian history. She begins with the basics: How, after being elected in 2000, Putin rigged the 2003 parliamentary elections and then convinced the Duma to give him the power to appoint previously elected regional leaders, effectively ending the near-autonomy of the provinces and their ability to protest Kremlin policy (One of his supporters, the current prime minister of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadryov, appears memorably as an illiterate psychopath). She describes Putin’s crackdown on dissent, the jailing of independent scholar Igor Sutyagin and oligarch-turned-opposition figure Mikhail Khodorkovsky on trumped-up charges. And she suggests that Putin possibly orchestrated the murders of journalist Paul Klebnikov and the human-rights activist Nicolai Girenko. Whether or not Putin gave the orders, he certainly benefited from their protests being silenced.

Much of this has been reported in the West, if not much remarked upon. But in her diary, Politkovskaya also enters territory that has been all but unmentioned outside of Russia, where the government strictly controls the media and limits access for foreign journalists. She describes the country’s rapidly metastasizing xenophobia, and her horror upon reading of a 9-year-old Tadjik girl murdered by skinheads in St. Petersburg. She reports on the hunger strike conducted by Russia’s Heroes, a collection of state-recognized civil and military stand-outs who balked when the Kremlin reduced their benefits and stripped them of burial honors. Putin acquiesced to the Heroes, but he refused to budge for the family members of victims from the 2004 Beslan hostage crisis. When the families leveraged their grief to seek the unreleased findings of the official investigation into the bloody siege, Putin stonewalled. At that moment, he appears at his inhuman worst, an autocrat accountable only to own conveniently absent conscience.

Politkovskaya believes that under Putin, Russia has essentially reverted to a Soviet-style system in which the individual counts for little, if anything. Conscripted soldiers are still treated like cattle. In one instance, a young conscript was tortured to death by his comrades for having feet too big for the standard-issue boots; in another, Politkovskaya meets a 28-year-old veteran of the Chechen war, paralyzed from the chest down, who lives with his elderly mother on $43 a month. And as in the Brezhnev era, ambitious journalists and politicians know they can advance themselves with well-placed gestures of fealty, such as adoringly quoting Putin to his face. But Politkovskaya says the roots of the new wave of corruption stretch farther back than the Soviet era. In Putin the strongman, she claims, the “myth of the tsar” has been resurrected.

Politkovskaya is an erudite guide through the mess of modern Russia. She refers to Putin and the resurgent Communists as the Scylla and Carybdis between whom Russia sails. Putin’s theory of governance is summed up as l’etat, c’est Putin. But she is also combative and often cynical about her countrymen’s anemic opposition to him. “Anyone who hasn’t been hit in the pocket has nothing to say,” she writes. It’s easy for us to see why her friends and colleagues found her a bit of a nuisance—and why Putin hated her. Upon her death, he commented dryly that her influence in Russia had been minimal.

Amid the diary’s pervasive gloom there are a few small flickers of hope. Though she describes the post-Soviet democratic movement in Russia as fragmented and internecine, Politkovskaya nonetheless is cautiously optimistic about the staunchest of the new political opposition leaders. Pro-Western entrepreneur and Putin critic Irina Khakamada and former chess champion Gary Kasparov gain her respect with their uncompromising challenges to Putin. Indeed, Khakamada’s defiant rhetoric echoes Politkovskaya’s own. “In private [my friends] warn that I will simply be killed if I tell the truth,” Khakamada says, “I am not afraid of this terrorist regime…Our children must grow up free people.”

Like Khakamada, Politkovskaya knew that her refusal to surrender to the forces of lawlessness and repression that rule Russia put her in grave danger. Sadly, it is her tragic death, as much as her reporting, that has assured her legacy.

LET’S TALK ABOUT OPTIMISM FOR A CHANGE

Democracy and journalism are in crisis mode—and have been for a while. So how about doing something different?

Mother Jones did. We just merged with the Center for Investigative Reporting, bringing the radio show Reveal, the documentary film team CIR Studios, and Mother Jones together as one bigger, bolder investigative journalism nonprofit.

And this is the first time we’re asking you to support the new organization we’re building. In “Less Dreading, More Doing,” we lay it all out for you: why we merged, how we’re stronger together, why we’re optimistic about the work ahead, and why we need to raise the First $500,000 in online donations by June 22.

It won’t be easy. There are many exciting new things to share with you, but spoiler: Wiggle room in our budget is not among them. We can’t afford missing these goals. We need this to be a big one. Falling flat would be utterly devastating right now.

A First $500,000 donation of $500, $50, or $5 would mean the world to us—a signal that you believe in the power of independent investigative reporting like we do. And whether you can pitch in or not, we have a free Strengthen Journalism sticker for you so you can help us spread the word and make the most of this huge moment.

payment methods

LET’S TALK ABOUT OPTIMISM FOR A CHANGE

Democracy and journalism are in crisis mode—and have been for a while. So how about doing something different?

Mother Jones did. We just merged with the Center for Investigative Reporting, bringing the radio show Reveal, the documentary film team CIR Studios, and Mother Jones together as one bigger, bolder investigative journalism nonprofit.

And this is the first time we’re asking you to support the new organization we’re building. In “Less Dreading, More Doing,” we lay it all out for you: why we merged, how we’re stronger together, why we’re optimistic about the work ahead, and why we need to raise the First $500,000 in online donations by June 22.

It won’t be easy. There are many exciting new things to share with you, but spoiler: Wiggle room in our budget is not among them. We can’t afford missing these goals. We need this to be a big one. Falling flat would be utterly devastating right now.

A First $500,000 donation of $500, $50, or $5 would mean the world to us—a signal that you believe in the power of independent investigative reporting like we do. And whether you can pitch in or not, we have a free Strengthen Journalism sticker for you so you can help us spread the word and make the most of this huge moment.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate